An empty enterprise keynote hall before doors open, lit by a single beam of light
Private strategic brief · Prepared for Saroosh Gull & the EventCombo board

The signal is already there.
The room is empty.

EventCombo has enterprise proof, a competitive product, and an audience that responds when you speak clearly. What it does not yet have is a system that carries that proof to the people who sign contracts. This is the plan to build one, in stages, with a decision gate at every step.

Today ~$3M ARR Target $10M+ ARR Pilot from $3K–$5K/mo Prepared Aug 31, 2026
Executive summary

Three hard truths, and the one move that follows from them.

Every number on this page was pulled from public sources and third-party tools between August 28 and August 31, 2026, and is labelled by how firmly we can stand behind it. Nothing here requires you to take our word for it.

Hard truth 01

You are not an unknown product. You are an unread one.

EventCombo publishes 48 enterprise case studies including Porsche, CBRE, Toyota, Hertz, Turo, Cboe, Blue Cross and the University of Tennessee. Not one of the 20 we audited contains a single video. The proof exists in text and stops there.

Hard truth 02

Your best content already beat your subscriber count by 87x.

One film, The Hidden Costs of Event Tech Fragmentation, earned 33,055 views on a 380-subscriber channel. Your Smarsh customer story, posted 3 months later, earned 5. The difference is not production quality. It is what you chose to say and where you put it.

Hard truth 03

Search has filed you under the wrong category.

Your organic competitor set is populated by event agencies, not event platforms. Cvent does not appear in your top 50 organic competitors at all. You are not losing the software category. You are not yet in it.

EventCombo does not need to look bigger than it is. It needs the market to understand that it is already winning against bigger platforms, and why the right buyers should care now. The strategic thesis behind everything that follows
The recommended move

Buy strategic direction and distribution first. Buy production volume second.

You already employ eight to nine people who can make things. What has been missing since February is someone accountable for deciding what gets made, who it is for, where it lands, and what it is expected to return. Start with a contained pilot that proves the sequence on a small budget, then scale spend against evidence rather than optimism. The roadmap below is built so that the board can stop, continue, or accelerate at four defined checkpoints.

What we heard

You asked for meat on the bones. That is the whole point of this document.

In the August 28 conversation, the brief was specific: bring data, bring a budget you can defend, and bring a plan a board can approve. Three things you said shaped this entire proposal.

“It is a blank canvas. I want your vision, not mine repeated back.”

So this proposal does not simply agree with the current plan. It challenges two things directly: the assumption that executives are the right entry point, and the assumption that more content is the bottleneck. Both are addressed in the ICP and diagnosis sections.

“No one knows we exist.”

This is measurably true, and it is the most fixable problem on the list. Discovery is a distribution and positioning failure, not a product failure. We have quantified the gap in the Evidence section rather than asserting it.

“If $5K produces a $50K contract, I can justify a much larger retainer.”

That is exactly the right frame, and it is how the budget ladder below is constructed. Each phase has an explicit decision gate: a defined result that must appear before the next tier of spend is released. If the pilot does not clear its gate, the board does not approve Phase 2. That is by design.

Event operations command center with analytics displays
The evidence

The same company, the same channel, the same quarter.

This single comparison is the clearest argument for changing how EventCombo invests in marketing. Both films were produced by your team. Both were published to the same 380-subscriber channel. One found an audience. One did not.

0
“The Hidden Costs of Event Tech Fragmentation”
Published May 7, 2026. A point of view about the category, aimed at a problem buyers already feel. Roughly 87x your subscriber count.
versus
0
“How SMARSH Plans High-Stakes Executive Events”
Published Aug 17, 2026. Your strongest enterprise proof asset, launched into an empty room and embedded on zero pages of your website.

What this proves. EventCombo can absolutely earn attention. The category POV films do it repeatedly: 33,055 / 9,816 / 9,733 / 7,952 / 7,193 views. What EventCombo cannot currently do is convert that attention into pipeline, because the assets that would actually close an enterprise deal, the customer stories, are published where no one is looking and linked from nowhere. Your eight highest-performing videos account for roughly 70% of all 116,902 lifetime channel views. The other 338 videos share the remainder.

Where the audience actually is

You have built a real following. It is simply not on the platform where you publish your films.

LinkedIn followers
24,537
YouTube subscribers
380

Your LinkedIn audience is 64x your YouTube audience. Every customer film currently premieres to the smaller of the two. The cheapest available win in this entire proposal is to stop doing that.

The discoverability gap, measured

0Organic keywords

Down from 4,287 in June 2026. Verified

0Monthly organic visits

43% of it is people already searching your name. Verified

0Keywords in the top 3

1.9% of your ranking set. Verified

4.4%AI Overview presence

You appear in 88 of 2,005 AI answer boxes. Verified

The traffic decline: what we can and cannot confirm

An internal preliminary report referenced organic visits falling from roughly 7,700 last September to roughly 1,300, and a backlink profile down by more than half. We can confirm the endpoint but not the starting point.

  • Confirmed: current organic traffic sits at 1,341 monthly visits, which matches the ~1,300 figure closely.
  • Confirmed: keyword count fell from 4,287 (June 2026) to 3,264 (July) to 2,845 (August), a 33.6% decline in two months. The direction of travel is real and recent.
  • Not confirmed: the ~7,700 September baseline sits outside the 3-month window our tooling returned. We are not presenting a year-over-year percentage to the board until we can source it from Google Search Console directly.
  • Contradicted: the backlink profile is not down by half in the observable window. It rose from 138,437 to 141,624 links between June and August. The quality question is real; the volume question is not.

Recommended action before the board meeting: grant us read access to Google Search Console and GA4. That converts this section from “preliminary internal audit” to first-party data you can defend under questioning. It takes about five minutes to arrange.

Backlink quality: a risk worth auditing before it becomes a problem

EventCombo has 141,624 backlinks from 4,230 referring domains. Volume is not the issue. Composition might be.

  • A single library-calendar network, libnet.info, accounts for 49,070 of those links, roughly a third of the entire profile from one source.
  • A recognisable cluster of low-quality blog-farm domains appears high in the referring list, including ampblogs.com, tinyblogging.com, blogolize.com, bloguetechno.com, diowebhost.com, full-design.com and roughly a dozen close siblings. These share a well-known spam footprint.

This is flagged as Needs validation, not as an accusation. These links may predate current leadership or may have arrived unsolicited. The recommended step is a disavow-candidate audit in Phase 1, which is inexpensive and removes a latent risk before you scale content investment on top of it.

What EventCombo is already doing well (and should not change)

An honest diagnosis has to include what is working, partly because the board will ask, and partly because we do not want budget spent re-fixing solved problems.

  • The website is current and performing. The homepage was recently rebuilt and communicates clearly: SOC 2, GDPR, 24/7 human support, “zero operational failures.” We do not recommend a redesign. That budget belongs elsewhere.
  • Your llms.txt file is genuinely good. You publish 202 curated URLs for AI crawlers and 201 of them return healthy 200 responses. That is better AI-readiness plumbing than most companies of any size have. One dead link, /resources/webinar-central, is worth a five-minute fix.
  • An MCP integration already ships. /features/mcp is live. Very few competitors can say that, and almost nobody knows you can.
  • 48 published case studies is a genuinely rare asset base. The problem is packaging and distribution, not supply.
Two small content defects worth fixing this week

Both are quick, and both sit on pages tied to your most valuable logos.

  • On /case-study/porsche, the client name field beneath the headline reads “Smarsh” instead of “Porsche.” It appears to be a template copy-paste that was never caught. This is your single most impressive logo page.
  • The Toyota case study runs to roughly 158 words and Kennesaw State to roughly 245, against a 450–570 word norm across the rest of the library. Two strong logos are represented by placeholder-length pages.

Neither is a strategy problem. Both are the kind of detail that an enterprise buyer notices while doing diligence.

Market position

Cvent is not beating you on product. It is beating you on surface area.

Saroosh's read is that EventCombo wins deals against Cvent when it gets into the room. The data supports that being a discovery problem rather than a capability problem, and it also shows the category leader is not invulnerable.

Cvent, organic keywords
344,552
EventCombo, organic keywords
2,845
Cvent, monthly organic visits
380,925
EventCombo, monthly organic visits
1,341

The leader is shrinking too

Cvent's organic traffic fell from 418,512 to 380,925 between June and August 2026, roughly 9% in two months. This is not a fortress being defended. It is a category in motion, which is when challengers get their opening.

Their moat is a directory, not a product page

Cvent's top non-brand traffic comes from a venue marketplace and hospitality glossary content, pages about hotel room types and boutique hotels. They out-rank you with infrastructure, not with a better description of event software.

The comparable page gap

Cvent's event management software page draws 5,665 monthly visits. EventCombo's event planning software page ranks for 119 keywords and draws 4. Same page type. Same intent. That gap is addressable.

The finding that matters most

When we pulled EventCombo's organic competitor set, the top 50 was populated almost entirely by event agencies and event production companies: gpj.com, thecastlegrp.com, eventique.com, corporateeventslv.com, emrgmedia.com. Cvent does not appear at all. Meanwhile your best-performing article is a listicle about the top corporate event planners in Dallas. Search engines and AI systems have concluded that EventCombo is an event services company. Your buyers are searching for event software. Correcting that classification is a core Phase 1 and Phase 3 objective, and it is why we are not recommending you simply publish more articles.

ICP strategy

Sell to the person who feels the pain, not only the person who signs.

ICP means ideal customer profile: the specific type of organisation and the specific roles inside it that we target. The current model has three tiers: executives, middle management, and users. It is not wrong, it is just top-heavy. CMOs and CROs control budget but rarely evaluate event software themselves, and they are the hardest people alive to reach cold.

Current approach

Lead with the budget holder

  • CMOs, CROs and executive buyers as the primary entry point
  • VPs and managing directors as a secondary tier
  • Field marketers and event managers treated as end users, not as targets
  • Largely single-event corporate buyers
  • Vertical content produced in parallel lanes without a shared account target
Recommended sharpening

Lead with the champion, close with the budget holder

  • Keep executives in the campaign, but as the approval audience, reached through proof and ROI framing
  • Make event marketing managers, field marketing managers and corporate event managers the primary entry point. They feel the pain daily and they carry recommendations upward
  • Add revenue operations and sales leadership as an allied lane: they want faster lead action from events, which is a story you can already tell
  • Open a major new lane: trade show organisers, event networks and show producers
  • Concentrate all content and outreach against one shared named-account list, so activity compounds instead of scattering
Large trade show exhibition floor viewed from above
The ceiling argument

One-off corporate events cap your growth. Recurring show organisers do not.

If EventCombo sells primarily into single corporate events, every dollar of ARR requires a fresh sale. Trade show organisers, exhibition networks and show producers run high-volume recurring events on annual calendars. One relationship can carry many events, multi-year, with expansion built in.

This is the lane most likely to move EventCombo toward $10M ARR through fewer, larger, stickier wins rather than a higher volume of small ones. It also happens to suit your product: multi-organisation hierarchy, badge printing, lead retrieval, exhibitor and sponsor portals and floor plan design are already built and already sitting in the Business and Enterprise tiers.

Needs validation Target organisations to research and qualify in Phase 1 include Informa Markets, Clarion Events, RX (RELX), Freeman and T3 Expo, alongside major recurring shows. We will confirm fit, current platform, contract timing and reachable contacts before any are committed to a target list.

Vertical concentrations your existing case studies already prove

These are not aspirational verticals. Each one is backed by published customer stories on your own site, which means the credibility work is partly done.

  • Automotive and mobility: Porsche, Toyota, Hertz, Turo, Swickard Auto Group. This is your strongest single cluster and it is not being marketed as one.
  • Higher education: University of Tennessee, Kennesaw State University, York University, Carnegie, ANU, Association of Theological Schools. A repeatable, budget-cycle-driven segment.
  • Financial services and insurance: Cboe, GCM Grosvenor, DA Davidson, Blue Cross, Optimal Blue, Inspira Financials, Experior Financial.
  • Healthcare and life sciences: Sharp HealthCare (three separate stories), St. Luke's University Health Network, Supernus Pharmaceutical, Air Methods.
  • Professional services and real estate: CBRE, Authority Brands, Front Door, The Shyft Group.

Needs validation Deloitte and Volkswagen were named in conversation but do not have published case study pages. Before either appears in outreach or on a slide, we need written confirmation of the relationship and permission to reference it.

How we would build the target account lists

Segmented, named, and finite. The goal is roughly 300 to 500 qualified accounts across three lanes, not an unbounded list.

  • Lane A, show organisers and networks: qualified on event volume, recurring calendar, current platform and renewal timing.
  • Lane B, enterprise event and field marketing teams: qualified on company size, event cadence and the presence of a named event marketing or field marketing role.
  • Lane C, lookalikes of your won accounts: built directly from the five vertical clusters above, because these convert on a story you can already tell.

Each account gets a named contact, a role-matched message and a defined proof asset. Coverage of this list becomes a reported metric, which is how the board sees progress before revenue arrives.

Differentiation map

What EventCombo should be known for, stated in language a buyer can repeat.

We verified each of these against your live public pages on August 31, 2026. Claims we could confirm are marked verified. Claims that need your sign-off before they go into market are marked accordingly. Nothing enters outreach copy without clearing that bar.

PositionWhat we verifiedWhy a buyer caresStatus
No per-attendee or per-registration fee Your pricing page states it plainly: “Every plan includes unlimited events and unlimited registrations. You pay for your plan, not for how many people show up.” Professional $640/mo, Business $1,120/mo. This is the single sharpest hook you own. Registration-based pricing is the most resented line item in the category, and your top-performing films already attack exactly this. Lead with it. Verified
Transparent public pricing Real numbers published on the site, with an Enterprise tier for custom scope. Enterprise competitors typically hide pricing behind a sales call. Publishing it is a trust asset and a qualifier that saves your team time. Verified
White-label branded attendee experience “Branded attendee app” and custom domains ship in the Enterprise tier. The Porsche story documents a white-labelled event website across 13 markets with multilingual delivery. Decisive for premium brands and for show organisers who must own the attendee relationship end to end. Verified
Open API, 250+ integrations, and a live MCP layer Event API and Attendee API in Enterprise. 250+ native integrations listed. A shipping MCP feature page at /features/mcp. Immediate lead action in the CRM instead of a spreadsheet three weeks later. The MCP layer is a genuine forward position almost no competitor can claim today. Verified
Human support, 24/7 “A real person, any timezone, no bot queue.” 24×7×365 priority support and a dedicated account manager in Enterprise. When something breaks 40 minutes before a keynote, this is the only feature that matters. It is also your most emotionally persuasive video subject. Verified
Enterprise trust and compliance SOC 2, GDPR and CCPA stated publicly; accessibility referenced on the homepage. Removes the procurement objection early. Necessary to compete for show organisers and regulated verticals. Verified
Direct cost comparison against Cvent Not published. Your films argue the category is overpriced, but no page substantiates it with a like-for-like comparison. This is the highest-value page you do not currently have, and a primary Phase 3 build. Needs validation
Developer-facing API documentation /api, /developers, /docs and /api-docs all return 404. The real page exists at /features/integrations/api, which is not where anyone looks. If the API, SDK and hackathon push are central to the growth story, a developer must be able to find the documentation by guessing the URL. Today they cannot. Opportunity

The positioning line we would test first: EventCombo is the enterprise event platform that does not charge you for showing up. Same enterprise depth, without the registration tax, and a human on the phone when it counts. That sentence is defensible today, on your own published pricing, and it is the argument your audience has already rewarded with 33,055 views.

The proof engine

You have the logos. You do not yet have the assets.

Forty-eight enterprise case studies exist as text. Zero of the twenty we audited contain video. This is the largest untapped asset on the balance sheet, and converting it is exactly what Whisenhunt Media was built to do.

Not stiff 60 Minutes interviews. Modern, entertaining, attention-grabbing, and still premium enough that a procurement committee takes it seriously. Saroosh's brief, and our approach to it
Cinema camera set up for a premium corporate executive interview

Tier 1 · The flagship film

One broadcast-quality customer story, shot on location with a marquee logo. Cinematic interview, real operational footage, the moment something nearly went wrong and did not. This is the asset that wins enterprise trust and anchors the sales deck for two years.

Tier 2 · The authority spot

A 90-second brand and category film that carries the pricing argument and the human-support promise. Built to run as paid media, on the homepage, and at the top of every sales conversation.

Tier 3 · The cut-down system

Every shoot yields 8 to 15 short-form variants, role-segmented, sized for LinkedIn first. One production day becomes a quarter of distribution rather than one upload.

The distribution rule that changes the return on all of it

Producing more film without fixing placement would repeat the Smarsh outcome at a higher cost. So every asset we produce is governed by three non-negotiable rules:

  • Every customer film is embedded on its own case study page. The Smarsh film belongs on the Smarsh page. Today it is on neither that page nor any other.
  • LinkedIn is the premiere channel, not YouTube. 24,537 followers versus 380. Native upload, not a link out.
  • Every film is cut for at least three roles before it ships: the executive who approves, the event manager who champions, and the sales leader who wants the leads faster.
Which customers to approach first, and in what order

Sequenced by enterprise credibility weighted against likely willingness to participate.

  • First wave: Smarsh and Turo. Both already agreed to be filmed once, so the relationship and the permission precedent exist. Re-cutting and properly distributing this footage is the fastest possible win.
  • Second wave: Porsche and CBRE. Highest brand transfer value. Longer approval chains, so start the permission conversation in Phase 1 even though production sits in Phase 2.
  • Third wave: a higher education story and a healthcare story, chosen to unlock the two most repeatable verticals.
  • Held back: Deloitte until the relationship is confirmed in writing.

Needs validation Every logo used in outreach requires documented permission. We will supply the release template and manage the approval trail.

What we would need from EventCombo to produce these
  • An introduction to the customer champion at each target account, made by Saroosh or the account owner.
  • One shoot day per flagship story, on the customer's site, ideally attached to an event they are already running so we capture real operations rather than a staged office.
  • Brand assets, logo permissions and any legal review requirements, gathered up front.
  • Access to your existing footage archive. Some of the 346 videos on the channel may contain usable material that has never been properly cut or distributed.
Campaign architecture

From fragmented activity to a growth system.

Today, content, video, LinkedIn, webinars and white papers each run as separate lanes. In the recommended model they become one sequence pointed at one named account list, where each stage feeds the next.

01Identify

Named accounts across three lanes, with role-level contacts and a qualifying signal for each. Nothing is sent to an unqualified list.

02Reach

Multi-touch, multi-sender email and LinkedIn outreach, personalised and direct. Modelled on the sequence that reached Saroosh, because it demonstrably worked.

03Prove

Every conversation lands on a proof asset matched to that person's role and vertical, not a generic demo page.

04Compound

Retargeting, GEO and SEO capture, and paid amplification of only the assets that already earned organic attention.

Abstract diagram of signal lines radiating from a single point
GEO and AI discovery

You asked about being first in AI answers. Here is the honest position.

GEO means generative engine optimisation: being cited when someone asks ChatGPT, Gemini or Google's AI Overview to recommend a platform, rather than ranking on a page of blue links.

EventCombo currently appears in 88 of 2,005 AI Overview results across its own keyword universe, roughly 4.4%. That is low, but the underlying plumbing is unusually good: your llms.txt is well-maintained with 201 of 202 URLs healthy, which is ahead of most companies in any category.

The gap is not technical readiness. It is that AI systems have no comparison page, no pricing-difference page, no public API documentation and no structured proof pages to cite about EventCombo specifically. Building those is the fastest route to being named in the answer, and it is the same work that fixes the category-classification problem. This is a real opening: outside Cvent, no competitor has locked this down.

Phased roadmap

Four phases, four decision gates, no blind spend.

Each phase has to earn the next one. The gates below are the specific results the board should require before releasing additional budget. If a gate is missed, the correct decision is to pause and diagnose, and we will say so directly rather than ask for more time.

Phase 1 · Months 1–3$3K – $5K / month

Foundation, ICP reset and pipeline pilot

Establish the strategic layer that has been missing since February, and prove the outreach motion on a small, contained budget before anything scales.

  • ICP definition and buyer/champion lane mapping
  • Segmented target account lists across the three lanes
  • Positioning and message architecture, led by the pricing hook
  • Multi-touch email and LinkedIn outreach, live
  • Analytics and attribution baseline via GSC and GA4 access
  • Backlink risk audit and disavow candidate review
  • Quick-fix pass: Porsche page defect, thin case studies, dead llms.txt link
  • Permission conversations opened with first and second wave customers
Decision gate 1Measurable reply and positive-reply rates against a named account list, with booked qualified calls attributable to the outreach motion. Board reviews actual numbers before Phase 2 is funded. Additional list, tooling and any ad costs are passed through at cost and reported separately.
Phase 2 · Months 3–7$10K – $20K / month

Authority and proof engine

Convert existing logos into premium trust assets, and fix the distribution failure that is currently wasting the video work your team already does.

  • Flagship customer film, shot on location
  • 90-second authority spot carrying the pricing and support argument
  • 8–15 short-form cuts per shoot, role-segmented
  • Every customer film embedded on its own case study page
  • LinkedIn-first distribution, native upload
  • Sales enablement kit built from the same footage
  • Case study pages rebuilt as conversion assets, not archives
  • Vertical proof packages for automotive, higher education and healthcare
Decision gate 2Proof assets demonstrably shortening or improving sales conversations, engagement concentrated in target accounts rather than general audience, and at least one closed or materially advanced deal that can be traced to a proof asset. Range reflects content volume, travel and production scope.
Phase 3 · Months 6–12$20K – $30K+ / month

Integrated demand, GEO/SEO and paid scale

Expand from outreach into a full acquisition system, and correct the category classification problem at its root.

  • LinkedIn paid, retargeting and buyer-intent placements
  • Amplify only the assets that already earned organic attention
  • Competitor comparison pages, built carefully and factually
  • Industry, use-case and business-outcome page architecture
  • Public developer and API documentation landing pages
  • Schema, structured data and AI-citable proof pages
  • PR, review-site and listicle placement strategy
  • Content re-pointed at software buyers, not agency shoppers
Decision gate 3Channel economics proven: a known cost per qualified opportunity, a working attribution model, and non-branded organic and AI-answer presence trending up from the 4.4% baseline. Spend scales against these numbers, not against a calendar.
Phase 4 · Month 12+Scales with pipeline

Category position and strategic expansion

Establish EventCombo as the obvious modern alternative to legacy enterprise event platforms, and move up-market into recurring event networks.

  • Category narrative: the event operating system for revenue-focused events
  • Show organiser and event network partnership programme
  • Executive thought leadership built around the founder
  • Owned category moment: research, index or annual report
  • Partner and integration co-marketing
  • Expansion motion inside existing enterprise accounts
Decision gate 4Budget escalates strictly against realised pipeline and ROI, never against an arbitrary spend target. At this stage the board should be approving investment against a known return, not a forecast.

What we are deliberately not promising

We will not guarantee a specific ARR outcome, a ranking position, or a date by which EventCombo reaches $10M. Anyone who does is guessing, and a board is right to distrust it. What we will commit to is the sequence, the deliverables, the reporting cadence, and the discipline of stopping at each gate to look at real numbers together. The budget ladder is designed so that EventCombo's exposure stays small until the evidence justifies more.

How we measure

Leading indicators first, because revenue is a lagging one.

Enterprise event software carries a long sales cycle. If the only metric is closed revenue, the board is flying blind for two quarters. These three tiers give Saroosh something honest to report every month, well before contracts land.

Leading · weeks 1–8

Early signal that the motion is working at all.

  • Target account coverage
  • Reply rate and positive reply rate
  • Booked qualified calls
  • Named account engagement
  • Content engagement by role
  • LinkedIn follower and engagement growth

Pipeline · months 2–6

Evidence that attention is turning into commercial motion.

  • Qualified opportunities created
  • Pipeline value by lane and vertical
  • Demo requests from non-branded sources
  • Sales cycle length against baseline
  • Proof asset influence on open deals
  • Cost per qualified opportunity

Revenue and position · months 6–12

The numbers the board ultimately funds against.

  • Closed-won attributable to the system
  • Average contract value by lane
  • Non-branded organic traffic share
  • AI Overview presence against the 4.4% baseline
  • Top-3 keyword count against the 54 baseline
  • Share of voice versus Cvent and Eventbrite

Reporting cadence. A short monthly written update against these metrics, and a full working session at each decision gate. Every number traced to its source so it survives board questioning. Where a number is estimated or directional, we will label it as such, exactly as we have done throughout this document.

Division of labour

Your team is not the problem. It is an underused asset.

Eight to nine talented people producing in vertical lanes without a strategic brain above them will produce a great deal of work and very little compounding. The recommendation is not to replace them. It is to point them.

FunctionWhisenhunt Media leadsEventCombo's team delivers
Strategy and sequencingOwn itInput and context
ICP and target account listsOwn itSales validation
Positioning and message architectureOwn itProduct accuracy review
Outreach campaignsBuild and runSender identities, CRM follow-up
Flagship and premium filmProduce end to endCustomer introductions, approvals
Short-form and social cutsDirect and templateExecute at volume
Written content and white papersBrief and set the topic mapWrite and publish
Webinars and the hackathon pushPosition and promoteRun the programme
Website, SEO and GEO architectureOwn itImplementation support
Paid media and retargetingOwn itBudget approval
Reporting and board materialsOwn itRevenue data

This structure is deliberately cheaper than hiring a marketing director. It gives Saroosh the strategic layer he has been personally carrying since February, without adding headcount, and it raises the output of the team already on payroll. If EventCombo later hires a full-time marketing leader, this work becomes their operating system on day one rather than a handover problem.

First 90 days

What actually happens if this is approved on Friday.

30Days
  • Kickoff and access: GSC, GA4, CRM, brand assets
  • ICP and champion lanes locked with sales input
  • First target account list built and approved
  • Positioning and message architecture drafted
  • Baseline measurement report delivered
  • Quick-fix pass shipped on the site defects
60Days
  • Outreach live across email and LinkedIn
  • First reply and meeting data in hand
  • Smarsh and Turo footage re-cut and properly distributed
  • Customer films embedded on their case study pages
  • Permission process opened with Porsche and CBRE
  • Backlink risk audit delivered
90Days
  • Decision gate 1 review with the board
  • Qualified pipeline attributable to the motion
  • Show organiser lane researched and qualified
  • Flagship film scoped, scheduled and costed
  • Phase 2 recommendation, with real numbers behind it
Recommended next step

Approve the pilot. Keep the exposure small. Let the evidence decide the rest.

The ask is a Phase 1 pilot at $3K to $5K per month, with a board review at 90 days against the metrics on this page. That is a contained, defensible commitment that either produces qualified pipeline or tells you something true about the market. Both outcomes are worth more than another quarter of fragmented activity.

Before Friday, the single most useful thing EventCombo can do is grant read-only access to Google Search Console and GA4. It converts the preliminary figures in this document into first-party data, which is what makes the board conversation straightforward.

Appendix

Supporting detail, assumptions, and the questions we still have.

Everything below is optional reading for the board and essential reading for whoever runs this internally. We have kept our open questions visible rather than tidying them away.

Competitor notes: Cvent, Eventbrite and the legacy field

Cvent is the reference competitor and the one Saroosh names in deals. Verified position as of August 2026: 344,552 organic keywords and roughly 380,925 monthly organic visits, against EventCombo's 2,845 and 1,341. The important nuance is that Cvent's traffic advantage is built on a venue directory and a large hospitality content library, not on superior product pages. Their traffic also fell about 9% between June and August 2026. They are large, not immovable.

Eventbrite competes on a different axis, consumer and small-business ticketing, with far less enterprise depth. It is a useful contrast in messaging but not the account you lose to.

The realistic near-term target is not to out-rank Cvent. It is to appear credibly in the same consideration set, which currently does not happen. Recall that Cvent does not appear anywhere in EventCombo's top 50 organic competitors, because search has classified EventCombo alongside event agencies instead.

A note of caution on comparison content: comparison and alternative pages are among the highest-converting assets in B2B software, and they are also the easiest place to create legal exposure. Every claim on those pages will be sourced to a competitor's own public material and dated, or it will not ship.

Sample outreach angles, by role

Directional only. Real sequences are built in Phase 1 against the actual account list, and every one leads with something specific to that company rather than a template.

  • Event marketing manager: the operational relief angle. Fewer tools, fewer manual handoffs, a real person on support when something breaks before a keynote.
  • Field marketing manager: the speed-to-lead angle. Lead retrieval flowing into the CRM during the event, not a spreadsheet three weeks later.
  • Sales or revenue leader: the pipeline angle. Your biggest deal is already at your event. This is how your team finds it before the badges come off.
  • CFO or budget authority: the pricing angle. Unlimited events and unlimited registrations, with no per-attendee fee. Verified on the public pricing page.
  • Show organiser or producer: the scale angle. Multi-organisation hierarchy, exhibitor and sponsor portals, badge printing and floor plan design across a recurring calendar.
  • Developer or technical evaluator: the openness angle. Event and Attendee APIs, 250+ integrations, and a live MCP layer, which is genuinely ahead of the category.
Content ideas that follow from what already worked

Your audience has already told you what it wants. The films that broke through all attack the economics and complexity of the category: The Hidden Costs of Event Tech Fragmentation (33,055 views), Why Proving Event ROI is Broken in 2026 (9,816), Why Event Software Got So Expensive in 2026 (7,952), The Event Tech Cartel (4,707). Lean into that lane rather than diversifying away from it.

  • A public, sourced cost comparison that substantiates what those films assert.
  • A registration-fee calculator: what per-attendee pricing actually costs across a year of events.
  • The 40-minutes-before-keynote series: real support stories, told by the customer, not the vendor.
  • A show organiser operations series aimed squarely at the new ICP lane.
  • Public API and MCP documentation, positioned as a developer landing experience rather than a feature page.
  • An annual state-of-event-technology report, as the owned category moment in Phase 4.
Assumptions this plan rests on
  • ARR of roughly $3M and a target of $10M+ are as stated by Saroosh; we have not independently verified financials.
  • The existing marketing team of eight to nine people remains available to execute production and publishing under external strategic direction.
  • Named customers will participate in filmed proof assets subject to permission. Smarsh and Turo have already appeared on camera, which supports this assumption.
  • Budget bands are indicative and scope-dependent. List, tooling and advertising costs sit outside the retainer and are passed through at cost.
  • Board approval unlocks Phase 1 only. Every subsequent phase requires its gate to be cleared.
  • Third-party SEO metrics are directional estimates. First-party GSC and GA4 access replaces them with exact figures.
Open questions we need answered before Phase 1 begins
  • Can we get read-only Google Search Console and GA4 access this week?
  • Are the Deloitte and Volkswagen relationships confirmed, and are they referenceable in writing?
  • What is the current average contract value, and how does it differ between a single corporate event and a recurring organiser?
  • What does the sales team consider a qualified opportunity today, so that our reporting matches theirs?
  • Is there an existing footage archive from the 346 published videos that we can review before commissioning new production?
  • Who owns the website technically, and what is the turnaround for publishing new page templates?
  • What is the status and timing of the hackathon and API push, so that campaign sequencing can support it?
  • Was the $150K Google Ads budget spent, and is there historical performance data we can learn from?
Method and sources

Research conducted August 28 to 31, 2026, combining a conversation with Saroosh Gull on August 28, an internal Whisenhunt Media strategy session on August 31, and independent verification against public sources.

  • Search, keyword, competitor and backlink data: Search Atlas Site Explorer, August 2026 snapshot, US market.
  • Site architecture, pricing, case studies and llms.txt: direct crawl of eventcombo.com on August 31, 2026, including a status check of all 202 URLs published in llms.txt.
  • Video performance: direct scrape of the public Eventcombo Community YouTube channel, August 31, 2026, covering the 40 most recent uploads plus channel-level totals.
  • LinkedIn follower count: public company page, August 31, 2026.
  • Whisenhunt capability grounding: Whisenhunt Media Brand Vault and live service pages at whismedia.com/services.

Third-party SEO estimates are directional by nature. We have labelled every figure by confidence and flagged the one internal claim we could not corroborate rather than repeating it as fact.